miércoles, 2 de mayo de 2012

Geddes Axe

Y, Nihil novum sub sole

que sera Geddes Axe, a ver, Axe, hacha, a quien le cortaron la cabeza, ah

Geddes Axe: a brief explanation

The cuts that an incoming Conservative government will need to make will be the most severe since the 1920s, when the Geddes Axe was wielded. Harry Wallop explains why this 1922 policy still casts such a long shadow over politicians and economists.
An unemployed man with his family in Brighton 16 Nov 1921; Geddes Axe: a brief explanation
An unemployed man and his family on the streets of Brighton in 1921 
After the First World War, Britain was gripped by enormous debts and a growing sense of panic that the Government was hugely wasteful.
The national debt had risen dramatically from £677 million, about a quarter of the GDP, in 1910. By 1920 it was £7.81 billion, larger even than the country's GDP. A vast civil service, that had come together to administer the war effort, was still operating at full capacity, while spending on education had increased substantially. Many of the middle classes complained how their tax bills had shot up.
The Government was under pressure to do something. The Times newspaper noted in 1922: "There are signs of an astonished realisation of the alarming bill for civil pensions that in a few years will be a millstone on the taxpayer's neck."
The Anti-Waste League, formed by Lord Rothermere, had put up candidates and won three by-elections during 1921.

Observemos el termino, Anti-Waste league

y que paso?


It highlighted waste in all areas of public spending, including details such as there being a ratio of one cleaner for every vehicle in the Army.
Between 1921 and 1922 it recommended economies totalling £87 million, about 10 per cent of the country's entire GDP.
Though the cabinet only agreed to £52 million of cuts, these were enormous for the time and in the end, total cuts were larger than either of these figures. He was hailed a "superman" by one leading businessman, but the axe hit some people very hard and led to a large reduction in social benefits, particularly secondary education.
The biggest cuts were in the Army and Navy. The defence budget was cut by 42 per cent in the space of one year. But other workers were hit too.
Civil Service numbers were cut by 35 per cent - mostly female staff hired during the war.
At the close of 1921, wage cuts averaging 8 shillings a week had been imposed on 6 million workers. This equates to a £58 fall in today's money and led to growing anger against the government.

Como siempre

The cuts were driven by a Treasury desperate to keep a control of its debts, but they partly caused Britain's woes in the 1920s – a period of far greater economic trouble for the country than it ever experienced during the 1930s. The General Strike in 1926 can, in part, be explained by the mounting resentment caused by the cuts, though some ecomonists argue it helped Britain exit the vicious recession of 1919 to 1921 quicker than it might otherwise have done.
The Geddes Act, introduced by one of the great Liberal administrations, ironically gave impetus to burgeoning Labour Party. The number of seats it held rose from 59 in 1918 to 142 in 1922, reflecting a new coalition across class lines. It went on to form its first administration in 1924.

Original

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7640349/Geddes-Axe-a-brief-explanation.html

jueves, 26 de abril de 2012

Cuando coimeas hay dos partes

Walmart’s Mexican morass

The world’s biggest retailer is sent reeling by allegations of bribery


MOST weeks it slashes prices. This week it was Walmart’s turn to be slashed. Jittery investors cut $10 billion from the value of its shares after the New York Times on April 22nd reported insiders’ accounts of bribery in Mexico to accelerate the retailer’s expansion there.
Walmart’s Mexican arm, Walmex, stands accused of greasing local officials’ palms over several years to speed the granting of permits to open new stores. Managers at group headquarters in Bentonville, Arkansas, were apparently informed about the payments (which were said to be made through intermediaries) in 2005. They launched a probe, but wound it down without disciplining anyone. They did not disclose any of this to the authorities until last December. Walmart says it began an “extensive” investigation last autumn into its compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), America’s anti-bribery law. In a statement after the article appeared, it said: “If these allegations are true, it is not a reflection of who we are or what we stand for.”

no, no era aca

http://www.economist.com/node/21553451

martes, 3 de abril de 2012

La Silla del Aguila - Carlos Fuentes

En el año 2020, en un México sin telecomunicaciones ni computadoras porque los norteamericanos (proveedores únicos) lo tienen castigado, se desata la lucha por la presidencia, es decir, por sentarse en la Silla del Águila y no abandonarla nunca.

en fin.............................

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Fuentes

martes, 27 de marzo de 2012

Marche un Morenó (o como se dice Moreno en frances)

Unfree trade

The European Commission is flirting dangerously with protectionism


“FREE trade, yes. Disloyal competition, no. Europe that opens all its public-procurement markets when others do not open them at all—it’s no.” Thus Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, in a markedly protectionist campaign speech earlier this month. Less than a fortnight later, the European Commission has snapped its heels. It has issued a proposal to let the EU close its public-procurement markets to firms from countries that exclude European competitors from their public contracts. Like Mr Sarkozy, Eurocrats insist that this is not protectionism. It is, rather, creating a lever to prise open closed markets. The proposal has been a long time coming; if the commission had to postpone every initiative because of an election, it could never do anything. Yet many still see this as a campaign gift to Mr Sarkozy.


http://www.economist.com/node/21551064